Defense of Fraud Charges
The financial sector meltdown has resulted in much closer scrutiny of financial institutions, mortgage lenders and their employees. The subprime lending and credit crisis has rippled into numerous cases involving fraud that are being pursued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) or under the umbrella of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). We would also assist clients being investigated for matters related to the Bank Secrecy Act.
Daniel Hurson is a Washington DC financial institution fraud attorney and AV* rated lawyer who is uniquely qualified and exceptionally effective at criminal defense and representation related to financial fraud of any type.
Representative cases: Attorney Hurson represented a Texas Savings and Loan executive in a federal bank fraud case and represented a DC bank in an FBI mortgage fraud investigation.
Bank and Mortgage Fraud Attorney for the Defense
Attorney Daniel Hurson, founder of The Law Offices of Daniel J. Hurson, LLC, is a former SEC enforcement lawyer and former federal prosecutor. This experience can be put to use for your defense in civil litigation or criminal court regarding any of the following types of charges:
- Credit card fraud
- False statements to financial institutions or on loan applications
- Fraud related to international currency or financing transactions
- Identity theft
- Loan fraud
- Money laundering
- Mortgage fraud
- Procurement fraud
Direct Contact With Your Attorney
If you select our law firm you will get the lawyer you have chosen for all aspects of your defense. Call 202-530-1230 to discuss your case, or send our law firm an e-mail to schedule an appointment.
*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.
